Posts Tagged ‘Verizon’

Digesting the FCC Auction

Saturday, April 5th, 2008

$19 Billion for Spectrum

In case you haven’t been following the FCC auction of old TV airwaves, here’s a brief outline of the key points.

  • Verizon paid $9.4 billion for open-platform spectrum (meaning open to all applications and devices). This “open” regulation was the result of some lobbying and bidding on Google’s part, but frankly open-platform seems like a better business model to me anyway.
  • AT&T got spectrum (cost $2.5 billion) it touts to be more valuable because it “is not encumbered” by the open-platform regulation. Again, from a consumer vantage point, I’ve always found the closed-platform marketing model extremely annoying.
  • Meanwhile, DISH Network Corp. spent $711 to ALMOST establish a nationwide network. Coverage holes include LA and New York. It remains unclear what there trying to do.
  • Lastly Qualcomm Inc. paid $554.6 million for spectrum to supplement their existing service areas.
  • Verizon Pinned Down by State Regulation

    Wednesday, March 19th, 2008

    Verizon’s pinned down by state regulations in Maryland, Virginia, and New Jersey. Existing telecom regulations leave Verizon unable to compete with Comcast for internet service.

    While modern, cost-conscious, consumers move their home phone service over to internet carriers, Verizon suffers. Why? Traditional phone providers are heavily regulated in these states, while internet service isn’t. Functionally, Verizon is limited strictly to traditional phone service, even as phone service moves online. The Baltimore Business Journal explains:

    The Maryland Public Service Commission oversees basic public utilities, including phone services. Under state regulation, Verizon needs state approval for rate increases or the addition of new services. But states like Maryland have no authority over cable and Internet or wireless phone providers, which are monitored by the federal government.

    By rolling its phone services into packages that give consumers cable and Internet or by providing phone service through an Internet connection, Comcast and Vonage avoid state oversight.

    This means, for example, Verizon can’t do one of those popular high-speed internet and phoneThese backwards rules hurt both the provider and the consumer. A Verizon Maryland spokeswoman commented:

    “It’s time our state moves forward by bringing telecommunications regulation up to speed with the market,… [It’s] a market where most competitors face little to no regulation.”